As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases and sometimes recommend products from other sellers at no extra cost you. For more details see my disclosure policy and privacy policy.
You’ve heard both names. You’ve weighed the box sizes. Maybe you’ve even stood in a game store genuinely unsure which one belongs on your shelf. Gloomhaven and Frosthaven share the same universe, the same card-based combat DNA, and the same publisher — but they are meaningfully different games that appeal to different players and different groups.
This isn’t a case where the sequel is simply “better.” Frosthaven expands on everything Gloomhaven does, but expansion isn’t always what you need. The right choice comes down to what you actually want from a campaign game: a focused, tactical dungeon crawler or a sprawling world with its own economy, politics, and resource systems running alongside the combat.
| Gloomhaven | Frosthaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Players | 1–4 | 1–4 |
| Play time per scenario | 60–120 mins | 90–150 mins |
| Complexity | High | Very high |
| Between-scenario systems | City events, personal quests | Outpost management, crafting, seasonal events |
| Character classes | 17 | 17 new classes |
| Scenarios | 95 | 138 |
| Best for | Tactical campaign newcomers | Players ready for a deeper world simulation |
| Current edition | Updated 2nd edition | Original (no revised edition) |
What Both Games Share
Before getting into the differences, it’s worth being clear about what makes these games feel like siblings rather than strangers.
Both games use the same card-based action system, where your hand of ability cards defines what you can do each round, and losing cards is how your stamina runs down. Both are dungeon crawlers at heart — you move through rooms, fight enemies controlled by an AI deck, and complete objectives to progress the story. Both reward learning enemy patterns, positioning your party efficiently, and knowing when to push hard versus when to retreat.
The cooperative experience is also structured the same way. You’re not playing against each other; you’re solving tactical puzzles together, managing shared resources, and trying to keep everyone alive long enough to complete scenarios. If your group is already sold on that style of play, both games will feel immediately familiar once you understand the core loop.
The Legacy-Lite Campaign Structure
Neither game is a true legacy game — you don’t destroy components or make permanent irreversible changes to the box. But both use a campaign structure where your choices carry forward. Decisions made in one scenario can unlock new scenarios, close off others, or affect the overall narrative of your playthrough.
This is worth highlighting because it’s what makes both games so replayable and so different from a standard dungeon crawler like Descent: Legends of the Dark. The world responds to what you do, which means two groups playing the same game can have genuinely different campaign experiences.
Gloomhaven: The Focused Tactical Experience
Gloomhaven’s reputation is built on its tactical combat. The game strips away a lot of the between-scenario complexity that exists in its sequel and puts almost all of its design weight on the scenarios themselves. When you’re playing Gloomhaven, the game you’re playing is almost entirely the dungeon-clearing game.
Between scenarios, you’ll visit Gloomhaven — the city — where you can buy gear, upgrade your abilities, and receive city events that occasionally branch the story. These systems exist and matter, but they’re not particularly demanding. You can make good decisions in the city relatively intuitively once you understand the basics. The game trusts you to spend most of your mental energy on what happens inside the dungeon.
Character Classes and Progression
One of Gloomhaven’s best design choices is how it handles character retirement. Each character has a personal quest, and when they complete it, they retire — unlocking a new class and changing the world slightly. This means your party composition evolves across the campaign naturally, keeping the game fresh across a run that can easily stretch past 100 hours.
The 17 starting classes in Gloomhaven (plus unlockable ones) cover a wide range of playstyles. Some are straightforward damage dealers; others are positioning specialists, support characters, or unusual tactical puzzles in their own right. Finding synergies between what different classes can do is a big part of what makes Gloomhaven compelling — and the deck-building adjacent nature of ability card management will feel satisfying to players who enjoy hand optimization.
Who Gloomhaven Is For
Gloomhaven is the right choice for groups who want deep, challenging tactical combat without needing to learn a second game sitting on top of it. If your group is new to campaign dungeon crawlers, if you prefer your strategy focused and session-length manageable, or if you’ve been put off by the idea of managing a town economy between dungeon runs — Gloomhaven is where you belong.
It’s also worth noting that the current updated edition is well-supported. Cephalofair has maintained resources and rule support for it, which matters when you’re committing to a campaign that will run for months.
- Deep tactical combat that rewards reading the room
- More manageable session lengths than Frosthaven
- Character retirement system keeps the roster fresh across the full campaign
- Updated edition with active publisher support
- Lower overhead between scenarios means less setup friction
Frosthaven: The Deeper, Demanding Sequel
Frosthaven doesn’t replace Gloomhaven — it pushes everything further. The same card-based combat is there, and it’s still excellent, but it now sits inside a much larger game. Frosthaven asks you to run an outpost between scenarios, manage resources, craft equipment, navigate seasonal changes that affect what’s available to you, and deal with a town that can be attacked and damaged by external forces.
That’s a lot. And the community consensus is consistent: Frosthaven is more demanding, more exhausting for some groups, and more rewarding for others. Whether it sounds exciting or overwhelming is probably the clearest signal of which game you should buy.
The Outpost System
This is the most significant addition and the thing that most separates the two games. Between scenarios in Frosthaven, you manage the development of your settlement at the edge of the world. Buildings can be constructed, upgraded, and repaired. Resources are gathered during scenarios and spent to maintain and grow the outpost. Seasons change, affecting which resources are available and which threats you’ll face.
This layer adds genuine strategic depth to the between-scenario phase. The decisions you make about which buildings to prioritize, how to allocate resources, and when to push forward on the campaign versus when to consolidate your outpost can meaningfully affect your campaign experience. Players who love the kind of city-builder thinking found in heavier strategy games will find something to sink into here.
New Characters and Enemy Variety
Frosthaven introduces 17 entirely new character classes — none of the Gloomhaven classes carry over, though crossover rules exist if you specifically want that. These new classes reflect the colder, harsher setting: many have mechanics built around elemental interaction, extreme conditions, and the specific challenges of operating in a frozen frontier.
The enemy roster is also entirely new, with Cephalofair noting over twenty new enemy types built around the Frosthaven setting. New enemies mean new AI behavior patterns to learn, which extends the tactical freshness of the game across a campaign even longer than Gloomhaven’s.
Who Frosthaven Is For
Frosthaven suits groups who have already played Gloomhaven and found themselves wanting more — more systems, more complexity, more campaign to chew through. It’s also a strong fit for groups who specifically want the outpost management layer, who enjoy worker placement style resource decisions between their dungeon runs, or who want a campaign that genuinely feels like running an expedition into hostile territory rather than just clearing dungeons.
What it’s not ideal for: new players to the system, groups with inconsistent attendance who struggle to remember complex rules between sessions, or players who found Gloomhaven’s between-scenario phase tedious and were hoping a sequel might streamline it.
- 138 scenarios for an even longer campaign
- Outpost management creates meaningful between-session strategic decisions
- 17 brand-new character classes with mechanics built around the setting
- Heavier rules load requires more consistent group engagement
- Session length tends to run longer than equivalent Gloomhaven scenarios
Head-to-Head: Key Differences That Matter
Complexity and Learning Curve
Gloomhaven is not a simple game. It takes most groups several scenarios to internalize the rules and start playing fluidly. But once you’re past that initial learning curve, the system stabilises and the complexity lives primarily in the tactical moment-to-moment decisions.
Frosthaven never fully stabilises in the same way. The outpost rules, crafting system, seasonal events, and expanded campaign management introduce ongoing complexity that you’re always learning to navigate. This isn’t necessarily worse — for some players it’s exactly what they want — but you should go in with realistic expectations about how long getting comfortable with everything will take.
Session Length and Group Commitment
This is a practical consideration that matters more than it often gets discussed. Gloomhaven scenarios typically run 60–120 minutes. Frosthaven scenarios skew longer, often running 90–150 minutes or more once you add the outpost phase. Over a campaign that spans dozens of sessions, that difference adds up significantly.
Groups with limited time, competing schedules, or who prefer a cleaner end point for each session will find Gloomhaven more manageable. Frosthaven rewards groups who can commit to longer regular sessions and who are genuinely invested in the between-scenario systems — not just tolerating them to get back to the dungeon.
Standalone vs. Sequel
Both games are standalone — you don’t need Gloomhaven to play Frosthaven. But playing Gloomhaven first isn’t just about learning the core rules; it’s about having a calibrated sense of your group’s appetite for this type of game before committing to something larger. Completing even 30–40 scenarios of Gloomhaven will tell you a lot about whether your group wants the Frosthaven experience.
This connects to a broader point about choosing your first complex game — the right entry point is the one your group will actually finish, not the most ambitious option.
The Gloomhaven Cluster
If you’re already invested in the Gloomhaven universe, it’s worth knowing what else exists in that world. The Gloomhaven expansions add content within the original system, while the alternatives to Gloomhaven cover games that occupy a similar space if you want something different in tone or complexity. Jaws of the Lion, in particular, is an excellent entry point for groups who aren’t sure they’re ready for the full Gloomhaven experience — shorter setup, a tutorial campaign, and a smaller footprint both physically and mentally.
Which One Should You Buy?
Buy Gloomhaven if:
- Your group is new to campaign dungeon crawlers
- You want focused tactical combat without heavy between-scenario management
- Session time is a constraint or your group plays inconsistently
- You’re not sure your group will want to commit to a longer, more demanding campaign
Buy Frosthaven if:
- Your group has played Gloomhaven and wants more complexity and scale
- The outpost management and resource systems sound exciting rather than exhausting
- You have a committed, consistent group with time for longer sessions
- You want a campaign that feels like running an expedition, not just clearing dungeons
Start with Jaws of the Lion if:
- You’ve never played Gloomhaven but want to know if the system is for you
- Your group prefers a shorter commitment before deciding on the full campaign
- Setup overhead is a concern
Both games represent some of the best that campaign dungeon crawlers have to offer. The question isn’t which one is better — it’s which one matches where your group actually is right now. Get that right, and you’ll have a campaign you’ll be talking about for years.
What’s your group’s history with dungeon crawlers? Have you made the jump from Gloomhaven to Frosthaven, or are you considering starting with Frosthaven directly? Let us know in the comments.
Continue Your Journey
- 10 Things You Need to Know About Gloomhaven — essential knowledge before you open the box
- Gloomhaven Expansions Ranked — what to add once you’re deep in the campaign
- Best Alternatives to Gloomhaven — great options if Gloomhaven isn’t quite the right fit
- Descent: Legends of the Dark — the app-driven dungeon crawler worth comparing
- Best Solo Board Games — because both games play great with one person
Want strategy guides, buying advice, and new release coverage delivered straight to your inbox? Subscribe to the Everything Is A Game newsletter.


